Over the last couple of days I have continued to think about the whole issue of holy places and pilgrimage. I’ve been reading a very useful book by Graham Tomlin and Peter Walker entitled: Walking in His Steps which has helped me to distil some of my thoughts. They suggest that we shouldn’t see these places as holy in the sense of being mysterious channels to get through to God; nor should we view them as places where there is some special presence of God. These places are not sacramental in the sense of being a means of grace and there is a danger that if we see some places as being particularly holy, we may lose sight of all the other places in the world where God is at work; because they don’t look particularly holy or religious they could be ignored or somehow seen as less important. The places where we live and work and worship in our everyday lives for example are supposed to be holy in the sense that God should be present and at work there as much as anywhere else.
Walker and Tomlin do suggest that we might find it helpful to think of the places as holy as a way of acknowledging the significance of these places to us as human beings of what has happened there in Christian history; these places can be special to us within human history, places of memory and association. Their way of describing this is to see these places as ‘holy’ in a historical rather than theological sense. These are sites of significance within religious history, so we may not want to venerate them but we should profoundly respect them and the impact they have had on people who have visited them.
‘What gives these biblical sites their extra potency (compared , say, with a site of secular history) is that they bring together in a unique way two vital strands in our faith: its foundation in past historical events and its experience of the living God in the here and now. So for people of faith, those who have encountered God in Jesus Christ, such places can deepen their imagination and renew their faith in striking ways as they reflect on what their Lord did in this location.’
The second insight from the book on this matter is the reminder that Christians have travelled to these sites to pray, reflect and remember upon the events that took place there for centuries. So the holiness may be seen to derive from the devotion and the love of the Christians who have been there over the years and when we visit we are aware of ‘the great cloud of witnesses, those who have lived, prayed, worshipped in these very places in the past’. This is helpful when it comes to the question of whether the events accorded to them really took place at particular sites. It is because of a site’s association with an event and that generations of Christians have come to pray and meditate there, that the place ‘has a power to concentrate our minds and hearts …… and therefore to refresh and reinvigorate our faith.’
Tomorrow we head off early for Bethlehem so a good opportunity to reflect further on these matters. Shalom.
Fascinated by your journey and observations. Look forward to the next instalment. Note the sunshine, we are experiencing sub zero temperatures. See you soon. Dave chest
ReplyDeleteHi Philip,
ReplyDeleteIn in teh Holy Land 97 with Graham and Pete we came up with a term "antecedent holiness" to indicate the difference between somewhere (say your local church) that you see as holy becase of what you experience there, and somewhere (like the Temple steps or the sea of Galillee or wherever you are going next) where things actually happened.